MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134692309 · doi:10.1103/physreve.103.023311

Lattice Boltzmann modeling of heat conduction enhancement by colloidal nanoparticle deposition in microporous structures

2021· article· en· W3134692309 on OpenAlexaff
Feifei Qin, Jianlin Zhao, Qinjun Kang, Thomas Brunschwiler, Dominique Derome, Jan Carmeliet

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanomaterials and Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersLos Alamos National LaboratorySchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMaterials scienceThermal conductionLattice Boltzmann methodsComposite materialMicroporous materialNanoparticleParticle sizeMicrostructureVolume fractionDeposition (geology)Suspension (topology)NanotechnologyChemical engineeringThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drying of colloidal suspension towards the exploitation of the resultant nanoparticle deposition has been applied in different research and engineering fields. Recent experimental studies have shown that neck-based thermal structure (NTS) by colloidal nanoparticle deposition between microsize filler particle configuration (FPC) can significantly enhance vertical heat conduction in innovative three-dimensional chip stacks [Brunschwiler et al., J. Electron. Packag. 138, 041009 (2016)10.1115/1.4034927]. However, an in-depth understanding of the mechanisms of colloidal liquid drying, neck formation, and their influence on heat conduction is still lacking. In this paper, using the lattice Boltzmann method, we model neck formation in FPCs and evaluate the thermal performances of resultant NTSs. The colloidal liquid is found drying continuously from the periphery of the microstructure to its center with a decreasing drying rate. With drying, more necks of smaller size are formed between adjacent filler particles, while fewer necks of larger size are formed between filler particle and the top/bottom plate of the FPCs. The necks, forming critical throats between the filler particles, are found to improve the heat flux significantly, leading to an overall heat conduction enhancement of 2.4 times. In addition, the neck count, size, and distribution as well as the thermal performance of NTSs are found to be similar for three different FPCs at a constant filler particle volume fraction. Our simulation results on neck formation and thermal performances of NTSs are in good agreement with experimental results. This demonstrates that the current lattice Boltzmann models are accurate in modeling drying of colloidal suspension and heat conduction in microporous structures, and have high potentials to study other problems such as surface coating, salt transport, salt crystallization, and food preserving.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. ESame topicNanomaterials and Printing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207