Eocene Metamorphism and Anatexis in the Kathmandu Klippe, Central Nepal: Implications for Early Crustal Thickening and Initial Rise of the Himalaya
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The continental collision between India and Asia has been ongoing since early Eocene time, but the orogenic record is typically dominated by Miocene and younger deformation and metamorphism that largely overprinted earlier Eocene‐Oligocene events. This hinders our understanding of how crustal thickening responds to initial collision and when the Himalayan mountains initially rise. The advancement of spatially precise petrochronology techniques, however, has provided the means to see through the Miocene overprint and enabled the characterization of Eocene metamorphism in different parts of the Himalaya. The current study presents new monazite petrochronology and paired thermobarometry from the Kathmandu klippe in the central Nepalese Himalaya. These data reveal Eocene prograde metamorphism (44‐38 Ma) and partial melting (38‐35 Ma) under peak P‐T conditions of 730 °C–760 °C and up to 10.5 kbar. The migmatites within the Kathmandu klippe is equivalent to the Upper or Uppermost Greater Himalayan Crystallines and should have been exhumed during Eocene‐Oligocene. The new evidence of Eocene metamorphism and anatexis presented herein adds to a growing body of data detailing initial crustal thickening during the early continent collision. The mid‐Eocene crustal thickening event indicates that the Himalayan felsic crust was thickened to a depth of ∼35 km shortly within 10–20 Myr of the initial collision, which was probably responsible for the initial topographic rise of the Himalayan proto‐mountains. Characterizing the effects of this early orogenesis is critical in understanding the Himalayan architecture prior to the better‐preserved Miocene metamorphism and anatexis record and how the orogen may have been preconditioned for the younger stage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".