MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134733052 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.0c10280

Triskelion Structured Colloidal Quantum Dots

2021· article· en· W3134733052 on OpenAlexafffund
Richard D. Edwards, Harold P. Hodgins, Ian Hamilton

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
FundersCompute CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWilfrid Laurier University
KeywordsQuantum dotNanocrystalColloidChemical physicsAb initioSurface chargeCore (optical fiber)Materials scienceNanotechnologyCharge (physics)QuantumNanoparticleChemistryCrystallographyPhysicsPhysical chemistryQuantum mechanicsComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show, using density functional theory and ab initio molecular dynamics, that certain small colloidal quantum dots with a mixed nanocrystal core capped with achiral surface ligands spontaneously form a triskelion (from the Greek, three-legged) structure with (approximate) C 3 symmetry that can be dynamically stable at room temperature when additionally capped with small amine ligands. Furthermore, the nanocrystal core also forms a triskelion structure. The focus of our study is a colloidal quantum dot with a Cd 16 Se 7 Te 3 core (and a charge of +12) capped with negatively charged surface ligands to achieve charge neutrality—in the simplest instance, 12 Cl – —to form the colloidal quantum dot Cd 16 Se 7 Te 3 Cl 12 . The small size of the core (for which almost all atoms are surface atoms), the high positive charge that destabilizes the core, the mixed (Cd/Te) composition that creates mechanical strain in the core, and the inclusion of precisely three Te atoms in the predominantly Se core all play critical roles in the spontaneous formation of the triskelion structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207