Simulation of diffuse and stringy fibrosis in a bilayer interconnected cable model of the left atrium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of this study is to design a computer model of the left atrium for investigating fibre-orientation-dependent microstructure such as stringy fibrosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed an approach for automatic construction of bilayer interconnected cable models from left atrial geometry and epi- and endocardial fibre orientation. The model consisted of two layers (epi- and endocardium) of longitudinal and transverse cables intertwined-like fabric threads, with a spatial discretization of 100 µm. Model validation was performed by comparison with cubic volumetric models in normal conditions. Then, diffuse (n = 2904), stringy (n = 3600), and mixed fibrosis patterns (n = 6840) were randomly generated by uncoupling longitudinal and transverse connections in the interconnected cable model. Fibrosis density was varied from 0% to 40% and mean stringy obstacle length from 0.1 to 2 mm. Total activation time, apparent anisotropy ratio, and local activation time jitter were computed during normal rhythm in each pattern. Non-linear regression formulas were identified for expressing measured propagation parameters as a function of fibrosis density and obstacle length (stringy and mixed patterns). Longer obstacles (even below tissue space constant) were independently associated with prolonged activation times, increased anisotropy, and local fluctuations in activation times. This effect was increased by endo-epicardial dissociation and mitigated when fibrosis was limited to the epicardium. CONCLUSION: Interconnected cable models enable the study of microstructure in organ-size models despite limitations in the description of transmural structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".