Damage Assessment of a continuous Hollow Core Deck Bridge subjected to ASR
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>An existing highway overpass located on a major motorway in Europe is examined on account of extensive longitudinal cracking on the lower face and sides of the deck, and signs of sustained damage in the piers. Material analysis reports have validated the existence of ASR activity in fine aggregates. The deck comprises a well reinforced hollow-core prestressed system, however longitudinal cracks penetrate to the interior of the hollow cores. The extent of damage is heavy considering that the laboratory values for free ASR expansion are below the threshold limits, suggesting that there may be underlying structural causes related to the response of the deck under traffic. Objective of the study is to interpret the reported damage, reproduce computationally the mechanics that led to the observed crack pattern and assess the residual structural capacity of the bridge. Detailed nonlinear finite element analysis is conducted to evaluate the structure and study the synergistic effects of structural demands, along with time-dependent phenomena and chemically induced expansion. The paper presents the numerical modeling and mechanistic evaluation of the findings through sensitivity analysis of various scenarios considered to reproduce the state of damage and to assess the effectiveness of various retrofitting strategies considered for bridge rehabilitation.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it