MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134785351 · doi:10.1155/2021/6613425

Hammerstein Box-Jenkins System Identification of the Cascaded Tanks Benchmark System

2021· article· en· W3134785351 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Problems in Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)System identificationNonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)MATLABLeast-squares function approximationNoise (video)Filter (signal processing)CascadeProcess (computing)AlgorithmComputer scienceEngineeringMathematicsData modelingArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A common process control application is the cascaded two-tank system, where the level is controlled in the second tank. A nonlinear system identification approach is presented in this work to predict the model structure parameters that minimize the difference between the estimated and measured data, using benchmark datasets. The general suggested structure consists of a static nonlinearity in cascade with a linear dynamic filter in addition to colored noise element. A one-step ahead prediction error-based technique is proposed to estimate the model. The model is identified using a separable least squares optimization, where only the parameters that appear nonlinearly in the output of the predictor are solved using a modified Levenberg–Marquardt iterative optimization approach, while the rest are fitted using simple least squares after each iteration. Finally, MATLAB simulation examples using benchmark data are included.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it