Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article aborde les multiples aspects de l’exposition du musée de l’Éphèbe d’Agde, organisée avec le DRASSM, qui conclut dix ans de fouilles sur le site. Il rappelle l’histoire du musée, fondé en 1985, et montre comment l’exposition de la Jeanne Élisabeth est une nouveauté radicale dans la programmation de ses expositions et de ses activités scientifiques. Elle change également l’image du musée, mieux connu pour ses collections d’antiquités. Le musée de l’Éphèbe consacre une partie croissante de sa collection à l’époque moderne, la Jeanne Élisabeth étant l’une des épaves les mieux étudiées du nord-ouest de la Méditerranée. L’article fait observer que le patrimoine maritime de l’Occitanie est encore un peu sous-estimé, peu présent dans les projets de recherche historique. Les musées valorisent cependant ce patrimoine, destiné à jouer un rôle de plus en plus important dans l’image culturelle et patrimoniale de la région.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".