Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over a span of six decades (1763-1821) the residents of Florida found themselves under a sequence of four sovereign nations-Spain, Great Britain, Spain again, and the United States.None of the three nations truly endeavored to fulfill their promises made in treaties to their own subjects or citizens or to their newly acquired, holdover citizens.Change swept across North America with the agreements set forth in the Treaties of Paris of 1763 and of 1783 and the Adams-Ons Treaty of 1820 as well as some secret arrangements.Each treaty redrew the map of North America and redrew the lives of ordinary persons.In Florida (later East Florida) and its capital city of St. Augustine, each treaty uprooted residents and jeopardized their ownership of real property.The high-level negotiators did not forget colonial residents, for the diplomats included clauses in each of the aforementioned treaties to protect ownership of real property or at least mitigate losses.Verbiage in the treaties succinctly expressed the philosophical positions of the party nations that private ownership of land deserved consideration but did not offer any prescriptions for resolving owners' claims.Defeated and departing nations looked to protect their subjects, while it was the victorious and incoming regimes that handled the claims of the "conquered."The Treaty of Paris ended the French and Indian War (Seven Years' War) and redrew the map of North America.France departed the North American continent.Great Britain acquired French Canada and La Florida.Spain
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it