Late sequelae of osteoarticular infections in pediatric patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract To review the orthopedic sequelae of pediatric patients diagnosed with osteoarticular infections (OAIs) and identify significant differences between those with and without sequelae. Medical charts between 2010 and 2016 from a tertiary-care pediatric hospital were reviewed to collect demographic and clinical data for this retrospective case series. The main inclusion criteria were: The following late sequelae were observed and aggregated: osteal deformations that led to limb-length discrepancies (LLD) superior to 5 mm, abnormal articular angulations of more than 5°, and symptomatic chondropathies visible on imaging studies after 1 year. The patients were divided into 2 subgroups: with and without sequelae. Chi-Squared tests were used for categorical variables and Mann–Whitney U tests for continuous data to identify statistically significant differences between the 2 subgroups. Among 401 patients with osteomyelitis and/or septic arthritis, 50 (12.5%) were included (24 girls and 26 boys). There were 36 (72%) cases of osteomyelitis, 8 (16%) cases of septic arthritis, and 6 (12%) cases of combined infection (3 acute/subacute and 3 chronic cases). Five (10%) patients had orthopedic sequelae at the latest follow-up. The total duration of antibiotic treatment (P = .002), infectious disease follow-up (P = .002), and the presence of sequestra (P = .005) were significantly different between subgroups. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 subgroups for the other variables, but some trends could be discerned. Only 4/50 patients developed a sequestrum, 2 of which were in the orthopedic sequelae subgroup. Furthermore, initial C-reactive protein (CRP) values were higher in the sequelae subgroup, as were the CRP values at hospital discharge. The orthopedic follow-up was also longer in the sequelae subgroup. Finally, the delay between the onset of symptoms and the beginning of antibiotic treatment was longer in the sequelae group. Patients with orthopedic sequelae had a longer antibiotic treatment and infectious disease follow-up, and were more likely to have presented with a sequestrum. Level of evidence: IV – case series.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".