Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Fourier transform of a N point time series is a N point complex series, while the S‐transform (ST) of the same time series is a 2D time–frequency complex matrix. The computation and storage of additional points are a major drag on the usage of ST. In this study the compact S‐transform (cST) is presented, with efficiencies brought about through computation of only selected voices (frequencies). The cST spectrum has uncomputed voice gaps that increase in width towards the higher frequencies. Plot of the cST magnitude spectrum is virtually indistinguishable from the ST magnitude plot. Local spectrum at any spot on the cST can be quickly examined in detail through interpolation. The cST requires the computation of approximately voices compared to for the ST. The proportion of computed voices decrease for larger N. For , ∼20% of the voices in the time‐frequency spectrum is computed; for only 14% of the voices is computed. For applications, such as audio and speech signal processing where segments of one million samples are not uncommon, <1% of the voices are computed, thereby reducing the computation time by ∼99%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".