MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134937473 · doi:10.1136/bcr-2020-241033

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis presenting as pancreatic disease

2021· article· en· W3134937473 on OpenAlexaff
J J Tao, Arnav Agarwal, Ari B. Cuperfain, Christian Pagnoux

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Case Reports · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGranulomatosis with polyangiitisMicroscopic polyangiitisDifferential diagnosisAnti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodyPancreatitisMalignancyVasculitisRadiologyAutoimmune pancreatitisEpigastric painPathologyRare diseaseProteinase 3Internal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a rare necrotising small vessel vasculitis typically associated with oronasal, pulmonary and renal manifestations. Pancreatic disease is an exceedingly rare initial presentation and is associated with delayed diagnosis and rapid progression. We discuss a 66-year-old woman presenting with epigastric pain, elevated lipase and radiographic evidence of focal pancreatitis. She had no relevant medical history and no lithiasis seen on imaging. Pertinent findings include strawberry gingivitis, positive proteinase-antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (98% specificity) and focal nodular parenchymal lung lesions on CT chest-all of which are consistent with a diagnosis of GPA. She was promptly started on high-dose steroids which resulted in significant clinical and biochemical improvement. Cyclophosphamide was added once biopsy confirmed the absence of malignancy. In order to optimise the clinical outcomes of GPA, physicians must keep a wide differential and high index of suspicion in the setting of unexplained pancreatitis with systemic features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.971

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Case ReportsSame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207