MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract PO-052: Exploring patient derived xenografts based pharmacogenomic data for precision oncology

2021· article· en· W3134979252 on OpenAlexaff
Arvind Singh Mer, Benjamin Haibe‐Kains

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacogenomicsPrecision medicinePersonalized medicineDrug responseMetadataComputational biologyCancerMedicineVisualizationBioinformaticsOncologyComputer scienceCancer researchBiologyDrugInternal medicinePharmacologyData miningPathologyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Preclinical cancer models play a vital role in oncology research and precision medicine. Patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDXs) are used as reliable preclinical models for studying tumor biology and for testing anti-cancer therapies that are tailored according to genomic characteristics of tumors. Several academic groups, research institutes, and commercial organizations are generating and distributing PDX models. However the distributed nature of PDX model generation and lack of central repository make it challenging to find PDX models with specific characteristics. Furthermore this also hinders meta-analysis (across datasets) of PDX pharmacogenomic data. International consortia and catalogs of PDX models such as PDXNet, EurOPDX and PDXFinder are being developed to standardize PDX associated metadata and facilitate material sharing. Recently we have developed Xenograft Visualization & Analysis (Xeva), an open-source software package in R programming language. Xeva allows PDX growth curve visualization, different response metrics computation and biomarker discovery. Extending to this we have developed XevaDB, a database of PDX drug response and genomic profiles. XevaDB is the first resource to allow concurrent visualization of drug response and associated molecular data such as mutation and copy number alterations. Furthermore XevaDB enables exploration of the tumor growth curve of a PDX model, along with corresponding control. XevaDB contains PDXs from >600 individual patients, spanning across nine different tissue types and >70 drugs. Using XevaDB, we have performed meta-analysis of PDX pharmacogenomic data and have identified 90 pathways significantly associated with response to 53 drugs (FDR < 5%). Our results show that activity of the EGFR signaling pathway is significantly associated with erlotinib response in lung cancer PDXs. We have also found that in PDXs, response to binimetinib is associated with the MAP kinase activation pathway. XevaDB provides a comprehensive resource to search and explore PDX pharmacogenomic data. By combining drug response with genomic data of PDXs, XevaDB allows researchers to quickly find the model of interest and access the data to answer their biological questions. As PDXs based pharmacogenomic datasets continue to expand, XevaDB will facilitate easy access and analysis of this valuable data by the scientific community. Citation Format: Arvind Singh Mer, Benjamin Haibe-Kains. Exploring patient derived xenografts based pharmacogenomic data for precision oncology [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Diagnosis, and Imaging; 2021 Jan 13-14. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(5_Suppl):Abstract nr PO-052.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.591
GPT teacher head0.614
Teacher spread0.023 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207