MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134996697 · doi:10.3749/canmin.2000056

Cesiokenopyrochlore, the First Natural Niobate with an Inverse Pyrochlore Structure

2021· article· en· W3134996697 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Atali A. Agakhanov, Anatoly V. Kasatkin, Sergey N. Britvin, Oleg I. Siidra, Leonid A. Pautov, Igor V. Pekov, Vladimir Yu. Karpenko

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNuclear materials and radiation effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrystallographyPyrochloreHolotypeCrystal structurePegmatiteElectron microprobeMineralogyChemistryMineralMaterials scienceGenusMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cesiokenopyrochlore is a new mineral belonging to the pyrochlore group. It was discovered in a specimen of granitic pegmatite collected at Tetezantsio, Betafo region, Madagascar. The mineral forms rough equant crystals up to 0.05 mm in size intergrown with béhierite and rynersonite. Cesiokenopyrochlore is light-brown, translucent, with resinous luster. Dcalc. = 5.984 g/cm3. In reflected light it is light gray, isotropic, with strong light-brown internal reflections. The crystal structure was refined to R1 = 0.0212. The mineral is cubic, , a = 10.444(1) Å, V = 1139.5(2) Å3, and Z = 8. The strongest lines of the powder X-ray diffraction pattern [d, Å, (I, %) (hkl)] are: 6.03 (37) (111), 3.70 (9) (220), 3.15 (100) (311), 3.02 (36) (222), 2.012 (17) (511, 333), 1.848 (19) (440), 1.576 (11) (622). The chemical composition is (wt.%; electron microprobe): Cs2O 22.66, Na2O 1.74, CaO 0.64, Nb2O5 20.87, Ta2O5 21.27, WO3 30.67, H2O (calc) 0.12, total 97.97. The empirical formula of the holotype specimen calculated on the basis of (Nb+Ta+W) = 2 apfu and (O+OH) = 6 apfu and written according to the pyrochlore-supergroup nomenclature is Na0.29Ca0.06(Nb0.81W0.69Ta0.50)Σ2[O5.93(OH)0.07]Σ6Cs0.83. The simplified formula of the holotype specimen is □2(Nb,W,Ta)Σ2O6Cs. Cesiokenopyrochlore is the first natural niobate to adopt the inverse pyrochlore structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicNuclear materials and radiation effectsFrench-language works237,207