MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135019605 · doi:10.1145/3448016.3452812

PCOR: Private Contextual Outlier Release via Differentially Private Search

2021· preprint· en· W3135019605 on OpenAlexafffund
Masoumeh Shafieinejad, Florian Kerschbaum, Ihab F. Ilyas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of WaterlooRoyal Bank of Canada
KeywordsOutlierAnomaly detectionContext (archaeology)Computer sciencePopulationMetric (unit)Differential privacyData miningArtificial intelligenceGeographyEngineeringMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Outlier detection plays a significant role in various real world applications such as intrusion, malfunction, and fraud detection. Traditionally, outlier detection techniques are applied to find outliers in the context of the whole dataset. However, this practice neglects the data points, namely contextual outliers, that are not outliers in the whole dataset but in some specific neighborhoods. Contextual outliers are particularly important in data exploration and targeted anomaly explanation and diagnosis. In these scenarios, the data owner computes the following information: i) The attributes that contribute to the abnormality of an outlier (metric), ii) Contextual description of the outlier's neighborhoods (context), and iii) The utility score of the context, e.g. its strength in showing the outlier's significance, or in relation to a particular explanation for the outlier. However, revealing the outlier's context leaks information about the other individuals in the population as well, violating their privacy. We address the issue of population privacy violations in this paper. There are two main challenges in defining and applying privacy in contextual outlier release. In this setting, the data owner is required to release a valid context for the queried record, i.e. a context in which the record is an outlier. Hence, the first major challenge is that the privacy technique must preserve the validity of the context for each record. We propose techniques to protect the privacy of individuals through a relaxed notion of differential privacy to satisfy this requirement. The second major challenge is applying the proposed techniques efficiently, as they impose intensive computation to the base algorithm. To overcome this challenge, we propose a graph structure to map the contexts to, and introduce differentially private graph search algorithms as efficient solutions for the computation problem caused by differential privacy techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0050.009
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207