Rare Collagenous Heterozygote Variants in Children With IgA Nephropathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Childhood IgA nephropathy (cIgAN) is a primary glomerulonephritis clinically characterized by microscopic hematuria and proteinuria, the presence of which may potentially overlap with Alport syndrome. Interestingly, earlier studies suggested that familial IgAN could be linked to the chromosome 2q36 region, also the coding region for collagen type 4 alpha 3/4 (COL4A3/A4). METHODS: To investigate a possible relationship or phenocopy between Alport syndrome and cIgAN, COL4A3, COL4A4, and COL4A5 exons were sequenced in 36 cIgAN patients. Clinical data and treatment were collected retrospectively. COL4A3/A4/A5 variants were classified according to American College of Medical Genetics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines. RESULTS: Four of 36 cIgAN patients were affected by ACMG class 4/5 COL4A3 heterozygous variants (COL4A3-cIgAN). We found no COL4A4 or COL4A5 variant. Despite having rare and deleterious COL4A3 variants, 3 of 4 COL4A3-cIgAN children developed clinical and biologic features of active IgAN rather than Alport syndrome. Response to intensive immunosuppressive treatment was favorable, leading to a reduction of endocapillary and extracapillary proliferation lesions. High levels of immune immunoglobulin G and A (IgG/IgA) complexes, reduction of proteinuria, and gradual stabilization of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) argued against Alport syndrome. Nevertheless, COL4A3-cIgAN patients seemed predisposed to a more serious IgAN presentation compared with the non‒COL4A3-cIgAN group, with more glomerulosclerosis and a lower eGFR over time. One of the 4 patients underwent kidney transplant with subsequent IgAN recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Predisposition factors for developing serious cIgAN flare-up should be considered for cIgAN with COL4A3 pathologic heterozygous variants. COL4A3 variants, usually responsible for Alport syndrome in adults, should not automatically exclude an immunosuppressive regimen in cIgAN. Moreover, evidence of an ACMG class 4/5 COL4A3 variant in early-stage cIgAN could be a helpful tool for stratifying severity of cIgAN beyond the Oxford classification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".