MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135081519 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2021.3057628

Broadband Doherty Power Amplifier Based on Coupled Phase Compensation Network

2021· article· en· W3135081519 on OpenAlexaff
Xin Yu Zhou, Wing Shing Chan, Wenjie Feng, Xiaohu Fang, Tushar Sharma, Shichang Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersResearch Grants Council, University Grants CommitteeNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAmplifierBandwidth (computing)WidebandBroadbandElectrical impedanceElectronic engineeringImpedance matchingElectrical engineeringHigh-electron-mobility transistorComputer scienceEngineeringMaterials scienceVoltageTelecommunicationsTransistor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, a new technique is presented to dramatically enhance the bandwidth of a postmatching Doherty power amplifier (PM-DPA). This technique is based on a coupled-line phase compensation network (PCN). Theoretical analysis shows this coupled-line PCN results in wideband impedance matching by reducing the external$Q$-factor in the peaking branch. Finally, when augmented with suitably selected peaking amplifier impedances, the proposed technique gave improved peak efficiency and output power over an extended bandwidth. For experimental verification, a DPA based on commercially available GaN HEMT devices (Cree CGH 40010F) was designed and fabricated. Measured results of the proposed DPA show 6-dB back-off operation between 1.3 and 2.3 GHz (55% fractional bandwidth) with efficiency in excess of 41%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicAdvanced Power Amplifier DesignFrench-language works237,207