MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135118655

Repercusiones económicas en Estados Unidos ante la terminación del TLCAN: un análisis subnacional

2019· article· es· W3135118655 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roberto Zepeda

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Zones and Regional Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este articulo analiza las repercusiones para los estados de Estados Unidos ante una eventual ruptura del Tratado de Libre Comercio de America del Norte (TLCAN). Para tal efecto, se identifican los estados de la Union Americana, asi como los sectores economicos, comerciales y productivos, que pueden verse afectados por las politicas y acciones del presidente Trump que lleven a la terminacion del TLCAN. En este sentido, se examina el nivel de dependencia economica de los estados subnacionales de Estados Unidos, principalmente en su relacion comercial con Mexico y Canada, pero tambien respecto al numero de empleos y cadenas productivas que dependen de tal relacion. Este articulo observa el panorama economico en la region, en particular indicadores economicos como exportaciones, importaciones, numero de empleos y actividades productivas. Se recurre a la paradiplomacia economica como marco teorico conceptual para explicar la creciente participacion de los estados subnacionales en las relaciones economicas internacionales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEconomic Zones and Regional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207