Theoretical and Experimental Approach for Understanding the Interactions Among SiO<sub>2</sub>Nanoparticles, CaCO<sub>3</sub>, and Xanthan Gum Components of Water-Based Mud
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to understand the interactions among SiO 2 nanoparticles (NPs) and the main chemical constituents of bentonite-free water-based mud, including CaCO 3 and xanthan gum. To this end, both theoretical and experimental protocols are developed coupling molecular dynamics simulations with filtration and rheological property measurements of mud systems having different NP contents. The resultant filter cakes are inspected to capture the role of interactions among the deposited components. Static filtration tests at high pressure–temperature are carried out on a standard filter paper as well as an in-house prepared sandstone disk. The filtrate volume and filter cake thickness and permeability were reduced by 56, 36, and 72%, respectively, at an optimum NP content of 0.1 wt %. Using the sandstone disk, the mud with the optimum NP content showed a 72 and 59% reduction in spurt loss and total filtrate volume, respectively. Scanning electron microscopy images showed that the NPs improved the morphology of the filter cake. The higher NP–sandstone interaction was successfully described by molecular dynamics simulations, which showed the highest interaction between sandstone and NPs followed by CaCO 3 and then the system xanthan gum and water polymer solution. Moreover, the theoretical analysis showed that SiO 2 NPs reduced the repulsion energy among the CaCO 3 surfaces, promoting a tighter filter cake and subsequently less mud filtrate, as evident experimentally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".