A DFT Study on the Mechanism and Origin of Regioselectivity in the Rhodium/Diene‐Catalyzed Ring‐Opening Reactions of C1‐Substituted Oxabenzonorbornadienes with Arylboronic Acids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The mechanism and the origin of the regioselectivity of the rhodium/diene‐catalyzed ring‐opening reactions of C1‐substituted oxabenzonorbornadienes with arylboronic acids has been examined using hybrid density functional theory (DFT). The overall mechanism for the reaction is considered as a four‐step reaction including transmetalation, carborhodation, β‐oxygen elimination, and protonolysis. The free energy profiles show that the rate‐determining step is involved in the protonolysis step which differs from previous mechanistic studies on metal‐catalyzed ring‐opening reactions of oxabenzonorbornadienes. Additionally, it is theorized the β‐oxygen elimination step is the origin of regioselectivity. DFT calculations predict the formation of the 1,2,4‐trisubstituted naphthalene framework is selective over the 1,1,2‐trisubstituted product, in agreement with experimental observations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".