MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135215220 · doi:10.1073/pnas.2019408118

Zinc finger protein E4F1 cooperates with PARP-1 and BRG1 to promote DNA double-strand break repair

2021· article· en· W3135215220 on OpenAlexafffund
Céline Moison, Jalila Chagraoui, Marie‐Christine Caron, Jean‐Philippe Gagné, Yan Coulombe, Guy G. Poirier, Jean‐Yves Masson, Guy Sauvageau

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontUniversité de MontréalInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGovernment of Canada
KeywordsDNA repairBiologyZinc fingerChromatin remodelingPoly ADP ribose polymeraseDNA damageChromatinHomologous recombinationReplication protein ADNACell biologyGeneticsSMARCA4DNA-binding proteinMolecular biologyPolymeraseTranscription factorGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Cycling cells acquire numerous DNA lesions under physiological conditions and thus require functional DNA damage response (DDR) pathways to support proper DNA repair. Hundreds of proteins orchestrate the DDR in time and space from very early events, such as the sensing of DNA lesions by DNA-dependent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) to late steps in chromatin restoration. Here we define a function of E4F1 in double-strand break repair. We show that E4F1 is rapidly recruited to DNA lesions by PARP-1, where it promotes γH2AX clearance, transcriptional silencing, DNA-end resection, and homologous recombination. These data provide an unsuspected molecular explanation for the essential role of E4F1 in DDR-associated cell cycle arrest and survival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicPARP inhibition in cancer therapyFrench-language works237,207