How grandparents can provide support and find a place in the family psychic cradle during the perinatal period
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A birth in any family represents a major identity-related upheaval. In this context, “becoming a grandparent” has not been widely studied. The authors conducted several interviews jointly with parents and their grandparents in an indiscriminate population in Quebec. The results illustrate the emotional issues that arise around birth between parents and their own parents. The parents speak out about the expectations of support from the latter. Meanwhile, the grandparents, who seem rather to be expectant of forging relations with the baby, afford that assistance to find their own place in the family economy. With differences according to sex, the grandparents thus contribute through that support to building what can be metaphorically represented as a psychic family cradle delimiting the inner circle of the parents with their infant. During the perinatal period, this grandparental “function” potentially opens out to a second circle around the baby with its own characteristics, providing a means of access for the interventions of professionals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".