MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3135313536 · doi:10.1002/cjce.24103

An efficient numerical model for nonisothermal fluid flow through porous media

2021· article· en· W3135313536 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yaghoub Dastkhan, Alireza Kazemi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)Computer scienceDependency (UML)Flow (mathematics)Porous mediumNumerical analysisResolution (logic)Applied mathematicsMathematical optimizationAlgorithmMechanicsPorosityMathematicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Temperature transient analysis has gained increasing attention in recent years due to the widespread application of downhole temperature sensors with high resolution and accuracy. With the fast, high resolution, and accurate temperature sensors in oil and gas wells, there is a need for the models and methods for analysis of transient temperature data in order to identify production and well completion problems and calculation of reservoir properties. Although there are many proposed analytical and numerical models, a majority of models are not applicable in practice due to limitations in basic assumptions and computational time. A procedure is proposed for numerical simulation of transient variations of sandface pressure and temperature. The fluid flow and energy equations are decoupled and solved simultaneously and the dependency of all properties on pressure and temperature is treated by nested iteration loops. The solution was compared with some analytical and numerical methods and was found as a computationally efficient calculation method. The benefit of the proposed method is its versatility, simplicity, speed, and ease of implementation in a programming language which can be used in conjunction with well test analysis models to correct for the effect of temperature and also constrain the uncertainty of reservoir parameters. It can also be embedded in compositional and reactive models to widen their applicability and accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering→Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis→French-language works237,207→