Vivre avec la mémoire de la catastrophe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objet de cet article est d’interroger la spatialité de la mémoire post-catastrophe et de montrer qu’elle modifie le rapport au territoire des habitants qui ont vécu l’événement. En considérant la crise éruptive de la Soufrière des années 1975-1977, nous étudions à la fois la mise en mémoire institutionnelle des événements et les mémoires individuelles des témoins directs. Nous montrons que quarante ans plus tard, les personnes conservent une mémoire sensible et chargée d’affects, qui est fortement spatialisée et qui possède une spatialité particulière. Vivre avec le volcan consiste aussi à vivre avec le souvenir de cette crise, qui est interprétée par les personnes comme une catastrophe. La mémoire produit ainsi de nouvelles territorialités et de nouveaux modes d’habiter. À l’inverse de la mémoire individuelle, la mémoire institutionnelle est en revanche peu présente et ne transforme pas le territoire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".