MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135331407 · doi:10.1155/2021/6652176

Influence of Binder Types and Temperatures on the Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Cemented Paste Backfill

2021· article· en· W3135331407 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Civil Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTailings Management and Properties
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCuring (chemistry)Compressive strengthMaterials scienceMicrostructureSlumpComposite materialScanning electron microscopeCementHydration reactionPortland cement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to study the influence of burial depth or fire on the core area of cemented paste backfill (CPB), the experiment of CPB with different types of binder and temperature was carried out. Three types of binders, red mud (RM), Portland cement (PC), and slag cement (SC), are used and tested at 20°C, 40°C, 60°C, and 80°C. The macroperformance and microstructural evolution of CPB are analyzed using slump, uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), X‐ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results show that the coupled effects of binder type and temperature have a significant impact on the macroscopic performance and microstructural evolution of CPB. The CPB slump prepared with three types of binder meets the production requirement of the mine. Regardless of curing temperature and curing time, the uniaxial compressive strength of CPB samples with PC and SC is much higher than that of CPB samples with red mud. When cured for 12 hours, the uniaxial compressive strength of CPB samples containing PC and SC increases first, then decreases, and finally increases again with the increase of temperature. However, with the increase of temperature, the uniaxial compressive strength of CPB samples containing RM only increases first and then decreases. When the curing temperature is less than 40°C, the main reason for the increase in UCS was attributed to the fact that the temperature increase accelerates the hydration reaction and improves the density of the sample. When the curing temperature is 60°C, the main reason for the decrease in UCS is the formation of the expansive ettringite (AFt) which destroys the internal spatial structure of the sample. When the curing temperature is 80°C, the UCS increases again due to the fact that such high temperature can destroy the crystal structure of AFt and harden the hydration product C‐S‐H gel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it