Robust Resource Allocation for Cooperative MISO-NOMA-Based Heterogeneous Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we consider a cooperative multiple-input single-output (MISO) heterogeneous communication network based on the power domain non-orthogonal multiple access (PD-NOMA). We aim to investigate a resource allocation problem regarding the uncertainty of the channel state information at the transmitter (CSIT) and the imperfect SIC case. Since there is an essential need for low-complexity algorithms with reasonably good performance for the extremely complex access architectures, we propose two novel methods based on matching game with externalities and successive convex approximation (SCA) to realize the hybrid scheme where the number of the cooperative nodes is variable. Moreover, we propose a new matching utility function to manage the interference caused by cooperative networks and PD-NOMA. We also devise two robust beamforming techniques to cope with the channel uncertainty based on the worst-case and stochastic-case scenarios. Simulation results evaluate the performance and the sensibility of the proposed methods and demonstrate that although the performance of the proposed distributed matching algorithm is slightly inferior to that of the SCA type, the complexity of the matching theory approach is substantially lower than that of the latter one.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it