MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135403057 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab002.023

A24 FCGBP MAINTAINS MUC2 MUCUS STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY BY STABILIZING THE MUCUS LAYER IN RESPONSE TO THE COLONIC PATHOGEN, <i>ENTAMOEBA HISTOLYTICA</i>

2021· article· en· W3135403057 on OpenAlexaff
Hayley Gorman, France Moreau, A Kim, Kris Chadee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAmoebic Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMucinMucusMucin 2BiologyEntamoeba histolyticaInnate immune systemMicrobiologyCell biologyBiochemistryGene expressionReceptorGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background MUC2 mucin is the major component of the colonic mucus bilayer that serves as the first line of innate host defense against pathogens while supporting a healthy microbiota and regulating epithelial barrier function. Proteomic studies of colonic mucus have identified various mucus-associated proteins. One of the most abundant is FCGBP, similar to MUC2 mucin, but its interaction with MUC2 or function is not known. Here, we elucidated FCGBP functional role in stabilizing MUC2 mucus and in innate host defence against Entamoeba histolytica (Eh). Aims Hypothesis: MUC2 mucin and FCGBP are coordinately produced and play an important role in innate host defense. The specific aims are: 1. To determine if FCGBP alters the structural integrity of the mucus layer 2. To determine the role of FCGBP in Eh infection Methods FCGBP mRNA and protein expression induced by Eh, in WT and FCGBP CRISPR/Cas9 LS174T goblet cells were analysed by RT-PCR and Western blotting. To compare integrity of the mucus layer, fluorescent Eh and 1μM fluorescent beads were inoculated on WT and KO monolayers and adherent Eh and bead penetrability analyzed. To quantify MUC2 and FCGBP degradation by Eh, purified MUC2 and recombinant FCGBP were incubated with Eh proteases (SPs) and Western blotted using highly specific antibodies against various regions of the proteins. Results In response to live Eh, FCGBP and MUC2 mRNA and protein expressions were significantly increased in a time-dependent manner. Surprisingly, FCGBP KO cells elicited robust expression of pro-inflammatory cytokine mRNA and protein as compared to WT cells. More fluorescent Eh were attached to the mucus layer of FCGBP KO cells as compared to WT or MUC2 KO cells. Fluorescent beads penetrated further towards the epithelial cell surface in KO as compared to WT cells. Interestingly, while both MUC2 and FCGBP from purified polymeric mucins were degraded by Eh SPs, FCGBP cleavage occurred at a faster rate than MUC2. Degradation of FCGBP and MUC2 was mediated by EhCP-A5 cysteine proteinase using purified MUC2 and recombinant FCGBP. Conclusions In WT goblet cells, FCGBP and MUC2 were upregulated temporally in response to Eh. The increase in pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in FCGBP KO cells in response to Eh suggests that Eh directly interacted with the cell surface suggesting an impaired protective mucus layer. In support of this, fluorescent beads penetrated the mucus layer close to the cell surface and more Eh were attached to FCGBP KO mucus demonstrating that FCGBP was critical in providing structural integrity of the mucus layer. In response to Eh, FCGBP degradation was a prerequisite for MUC2 cleavage, providing direct evidence that FCGBP and MUC2 interactions conferred biophysical properties of the protective functions of the mucus gel. Funding Agencies CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicAmoebic Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207