MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3135403795 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab002.009

A10 FOOD ANTIGEN-STRESS INTERACTION LEADS TO INCREASE PAIN SIGNALING IN ILEUM AND COLON VIA STAT6 IN AN IBS MODEL

2021· article· en· W3135403795 on OpenAlexaff
C. Lopez Lopez, Jessie J. Polanco, Yang Yu, Quentin Tsang, S Vanner, David E. Reed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvalbuminAntigenImmune systemDorsal root ganglionIleumSensitizationFood allergyImmunoglobulin EInternal medicineNociceptionHyperalgesiaMedicineNAV1EndocrinologyImmunologyChemistryAllergyReceptorAnatomyAntibodyDorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Abdominal pain can be triggered by food ingestion in IBS patients. Previously we have shown that a food antigen induces local release of immune mediators in the colon that increase dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neuron excitability when there is previous antigen exposure in the presence of psychological stress. However, it is unknown if this effect is limited to the colon. Furthermore, the involvement of histamine in the neuronal hyperexcitability suggests that the stress-food antigen interaction evokes a Th2 immune response. Thus, we sought to investigate the role of STAT6, a transcription factor downstream of Th2 cytokines and important for IgE production. Aims 1) Determine if stress-food antigen interaction leads to release of mediators within the small intestine that increase DRG neuron excitability. 2) Determine the involvement of STAT6 on neuronal hyperexcitability induced by the stress-food antigen interaction. Methods BALB/c mice were exposed to water avoidance stress (WAS) or sham stress (SHAM) for 1 hr daily for 10 days. On day 2–10, mice were exposed to ovalbumin (OVA) or saline (SAL). Seven days later, mice were re-exposed to either OVA or SAL every 2 days for 2 weeks yielding 3 groups: WAS/OVA+OVA, WAS/SAL+OVA, and SHAM/OVA+OVA. STAT6 deficient mice were also exposed to WAS/OVA+OVA protocol. Ileum or colonic supernatants were obtained 4 hours after tissue collection. DRG neurons were incubated overnight with supernatants prior to perforated patch clamp recordings. Neuronal excitability was evaluated by measuring the rheobase (minimum current to elicit an action potential, decreased rheobase indicates increased excitability). Mechanosensitivity of extrinsic afferent nerves innervating distal ileum was examined using ex vivo extracellular afferent nerve recordings. Data was analyzed by one or two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test. Results Ileum supernatants from WAS/OVA+OVA mice increased DRG neuron excitability compared to WAS/SAL+OVA and SHAM/OVA+OVA mice (63.3 ± 6.2 pA vs 83.2 ± 5.4 pA, 86.7 ± 4.5 pA, p<0.05). Ileum afferent nerve response to distention was significantly augmented in WAS/OVA+OVA mice compared to WAS/SAL+OVA and SHAM/OVA+OVA (P<0.05, n=4–7). DRG neurons incubated with WAS/OVA+OVA supernatant from STAT6 deficient mice were less excitable compared to neurons incubated with colonic supernatants from wild type mice (86.5 ± 4.1 pA vs 67.6 ± 4.8 pA, p<0.05). Conclusions Stress-food antigen interaction releases mediators in both the small intestine and colon to increase nociceptive signaling, an important finding as IBS can involve both areas. The release of excitatory mediators within the gut appears to involve STAT6. Thus, a stress-food antigen interaction evoking a Th2 immune response in the gut may be a mechanism underlying food induced symptoms in IBS. Funding Agencies Queen’s University, Department of Medicine

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicGastrointestinal motility and disorders→French-language works237,207→