MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135420168 · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-67070-2_1

AIM 2020 Challenge on Efficient Super-Resolution: Methods and Results

2020· book-chapter· en· W3135420168 on OpenAlexaff
Kai Zhang, Martin Danelljan, Yawei Li, Radu Timofte, Jie Liu, Jie Tang, Gangshan Wu, Yu Zhu, Xiangyu He, Wenjie Xu, Chenghua Li, Cong Leng, Jian Cheng, Guangyang Wu, Wenyi Wang, Xiaohong Liu, Hengyuan Zhao, Xiangtao Kong, Jingwen He, Yu Qiao, Chao Dong, Xiaotong Luo, Liang Chen, Jiangtao Zhang, Maitreya Suin, Kuldeep Purohit, A. N. Rajagopalan, Xiaochuan Li, Zhiqiang Lang, Jiangtao Nie, Wei Wei, Lei Zhang, Abdul Muqeet, Jiwon Hwang, Subin Yang, JungHeum Kang, Sung‐Ho Bae, Yongwoo Kim, Yanyun Qu, Geun-Woo Jeon, Jun-Ho Choi, Junhyuk Kim, Jong‐Seok Lee, Steven Marty, Eric Marty, Dongliang Xiong, Siang Chen, Lin Zha, Jiande Jiang, Xinbo Gao, Wen Lu, Haicheng Wang, Vineeth S. Bhaskara, Alex Levinshtein, Stavros Tsogkas, Allan Jepson, Xiangzhen Kong, Tongtong Zhao, Shanshan Zhao, P. S. Hrishikesh, Densen Puthussery, C. V. Jiji, Nan Nan, Shuai Liu, Jie Cai, Zibo Meng, Jiaming Ding, Chiu Man Ho, Xuehui Wang, Qiong Yan, Yuzhi Zhao, Long Chen, Long Sun, Wenhao Wang, Zhenbing Liu, Rushi Lan, Rao Muhammad Umer, Christian Micheloni

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Research Information System (University of Udine) · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsCentre for Social InnovationMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceFocus (optics)FLOPSImage (mathematics)Set (abstract data type)Resolution (logic)MagnificationArtificial intelligenceFactor (programming language)State (computer science)Computer engineeringAlgorithmParallel computingProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Research Information System (University of Udine)Same topicAdvanced Image Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207