A new genus and species in the Sporolithales (Corallinophycidae, Rhodophyta) from northern New Zealand: Roseapetra farriae sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new genus in the order Sporolithales (Corallinophycidae, Rhodophyta), Roseapetra farriae gen. et sp. nov. is described, based on material from northern New Zealand. Previously placed in the genus Heydrichia on the basis of morpho-anatomical characters, phylogenetic analyses have shown that this northern New Zealand taxon is not resolved with either Heydrichia or Sporolithon, the two genera currently recognized in this order. Roseapetra displays the key diagnostic features of the order, namely the production of cruciately divided tetrasporangia singly within calcified sporangial compartments. In Roseapetra the tetrasporangia are surrounded by an involucre, and mature tetrasporangia are subtended by up to three stalk cells. The tetrasporangial compartments are shed once spores have been released. Gametangial conceptacles are not shed but become buried, with secondary meristem producing lens-like areas of regrowth. While there are several morpho-anatomical characters that separate Roseapetra and Sporolithon, there are none that can be used to distinguish Roseapetra from Heydrichia: recognition of Roseapetra requires sequence data. Roseapetra farriae is found growing in the low intertidal zone on rocky reefs in shaded, understorey habitats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".