MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135508778 · doi:10.2749/newyork.2019.0608

Reliability-Based Site-Specific Live Load Models for the Gordie Howe International Bridge

2019· article· en· W3135508778 on OpenAlexaffabout
T. C. Ude, Yonghui He, Matt Chynoweth, Zaher Yousif

Bibliographic record

VenueReport · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsFord Motor Company (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)WindsorReliability (semiconductor)Structural loadEngineeringSpan (engineering)Limit (mathematics)Computer scienceStructural engineeringEnvironmental scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the development of project-specific live load models to achieve target reliability levels for the Gordie Howe International Bridge. This new bridge between Windsor, Ontario Canada and Detroit, Michigan USA will have a main span of 853 m (2800 ft), a design life of 125 years, and will experience atypical traffic patterns as a result of customs inspection plazas required at both ends of the bridge. Due to these variations relative to standard practice, large databases of weigh-in-motion data and simulation studies were used to modify the live load models of both country’s codes following the approach of NCHRP 683. The limit states addressed extend beyond the Strength 1 (ULS 1), to include high dead-to-live ratio combinations, and fatigue limit states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReportSame topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207