MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135511891 · doi:10.1158/1557-3265.adi21-pr-07

Abstract PR-07: ORCESTRA: A platform for orchestrating and sharing high-throughput multimodal data analyses

2021· article· en· W3135511891 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony Mammoliti, Petr Smirnov, Minoru Nakano, Zhaleh Safikhani, Sisira Kadambat Nair, Arvind Singh Mer, Chantal Ho, Gangesh Beri, Benjamin Haibe‐Kains

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene expression and cancer classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePipeline (software)BioconductorData sharingCloud computingInterface (matter)Open scienceBiological dataData scienceBioinformaticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Reproducibility is essential to Open Science. If a finding cannot be reproduced by independent research groups its relevance is extremely limited, regardless of its validity. It is therefore crucial for scientists to describe their experiments in sufficient detail so they can be reproduced, challenged, and built upon. However, due to recent technological advances in the biological and computational sciences, experimental protocols, data analysis and interpretation have become increasingly complex. This has made reproducing research findings more challenging, with some researchers going as far as suggesting that the biomedical sciences are experiencing a "reproducibility crisis". In order to overcome these issues we developed ORCESTRA, a cloud-based platform that provides a transparent, reproducible and flexible computational framework for processing and sharing high-throughput multimodal biomedical data. The platform enables processing of genomic and pharmacological profiles of cancer samples through the use of automated processing pipelines executed by Pachyderm, a data versioning and orchestration tool. ORCESTRA creates an integrated and fully documented data object known as a PharmacoSet (PSet) for future analyses using the Bioconductor PharmacoGx package. A PSet includes cell line and drug annotations, along with molecular and pharmacological data from the largest studies and consortia. Our platform is currently being expanded to additional data types, which includes toxicogenomics, xenographic pharmacogenomic data, radiomics, and clinical genomic data. The automated pipelines can be accessed via a web interface (www.orcestra.ca). Users can view and download existing dataset or request a new one by selecting pipeline parameters. The web application provides features to improve user experience, and to accommodate different scenarios for ORCESTRA deployment. They include a personal account to save PSets, a dashboard to check the status of a requested pipeline, email notification upon the pipeline completion, handling pipeline requests while the Pachyderm cluster is offline, and “manual push” of the pipeline requests once the cluster becomes online. Funding: This project is supported by CIHR, under the frame of ERA PerMed. Citation Format: Anthony Mammoliti, Petr Smirnov, Minoru Nakano, Zhaleh Safikhani, Sisira Nair, Arvind Singh Mer, Chantal Ho, Gangesh Beri, Benjamin Haibe-Kains. ORCESTRA: A platform for orchestrating and sharing high-throughput multimodal data analyses [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Diagnosis, and Imaging; 2021 Jan 13-14. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(5_Suppl):Abstract nr PR-07.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0090.013
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.654
GPT teacher head0.616
Teacher spread0.038 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicGene expression and cancer classificationFrench-language works237,207