MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135539930 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.201085-f

Efficacité et innocuité des écrans solaires pour la prévention du cancer de la peau

2021· review· fr· W3135539930 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Megan Sander, Michael Sander, Toni Burbidge, Jennifer Beecker

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2021
Typereview
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicSkin Protection and Aging
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

POINTS CLÉS Plus de 80 000 cas de cancer de la peau sont diagnostiqués au Canada chaque année[1][1]. Étant donné qu’on estime à 80 %–90 % la proportion de ces cancers qui sont associés à une exposition aux rayons ultraviolets, on préconise l’utilisation d’écrans solaires qui

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicSkin Protection and AgingFrench-language works237,207