MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135545972 · doi:10.5920/jpa.868

Toward a critical theory of playful research in the internet age exploring playful research in Second Life, Minecraft, and Hackerspaces/Makerspaces

2021· article· en· W3135545972 on OpenAlexaff
Jeremy Hunsinger

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Play in Adulthood · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Games and Media
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForgettingHappeningPsychologySociologyEpistemologyAestheticsArtCognitive psychologyPerformance artPhilosophyArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper engaged in the development of a critical theory of playful research. Using examples from Second Life, Minecraft, and hackerspaces/makerspaces, it argues that playful research is an intrinsic part of research ecologies.  It presents the idea that research can be joyful, liberating, transgressive in its pursuit of knowledge, and admits that the pursuit of knowledge also requires communal forgetting.  With those insights, it argues that playful research is happening and that we should encourage research to be playful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.924

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.257
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Play in AdulthoodSame topicDigital Games and MediaFrench-language works237,207