Association between Toll-like receptor gene polymorphisms and risk of Helicobacter pylori infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There were many case-control studies performed the association between TLRs gene polymorphisms and the correlation of Helicobactor pylori infection, these results were inconformity. Therefore, a comprehensive meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the TLRs gene polymorphism and susceptibility to H. pylori infection. METHODS: Eligible studies were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Cochrane library, CNKI, CBM, Wan Fang Database and VIP Database, all the databases were searched from inception to December 2020. OR with the corresponding 95% CI were presented as associations between certain TLR gene polymorphism and the risk of H. pylori infection, all the included data will be analyzed with the software of Review Manager 5.2 and STATA 14.2. RESULTS: This study will provide a high-quality evidence to find the TLR gene polymorphisms with H. pylori infection susceptibility. CONCLUSION: This study will explore which TLR genotype increase the risk of H. pylori infection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".