MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135557370 · doi:10.17504/protocols.io.4q4gvyw

RNA Isolation from Plant Tissue Protocol 2: McKenzie et al’s Qiagen hybrid method v1

2019· preprint· en· W3135557370 on OpenAlexaff
Donald J. MacKenzie, Morven A. McLean, S. Mukerji, Margaret Green

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant and Fungal Interactions Research
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRNA extractionRNAIsolation (microbiology)BiologyHorticultureBotanyGeneGeneticsBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Implemented by: Jim Leebens-Mack and Charlotte Carrigan This protocol was developed by McKenzie et al.2 to facilitate the isolation of RNA from woody plants rich in phenolics and polysaccharides, such as grapes (Vitaceae) and fruit bearing Rosaceae (apples, cherries and pears). The protocol is provided on Qiagen’s website as an alternative method to be used in combination with their RNeasy Plant Minikit. We repeat the protocol here in the event that this protocol is removed from Qiagen’s website or readers find it difficult to obtain the original publication. This protocol is part of a collection of eighteen protocols used to isolate total RNA from plant tissue. (RNA Isolation from Plant Tissue Collection: https://www.protocols.io/view/rna-isolation-from-plant-tissue-439gyr6) 2 McKenzie, D.J., McLean, M.A., Mukerji, S. & Green, M. Improved RNA extraction from woody plants for the detection of viral pathogens by reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction. Plant Disease 81, 222‐226 (1997).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant and Fungal Interactions ResearchFrench-language works237,207