MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135611066 · doi:10.4000/rsr.9420

Peur et religion dans le monachisme primitif

2020· article· fr· W3135611066 on OpenAlexaff
Fabrizio Vecoli

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences religieuses · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’article analyse le concept de peur dans la collection systématique des Apophthegmata Patrum. Cette source constitue une synthèse représentative de la doctrine ascétique du monachisme primitif et permet ainsi de nous éclairer sur un thème important de la pensée et de la pratique des Pères du désert. Ce que l’on se propose de montrer c’est que la peur est activement recherchée et entretenue comme instrument servant à produire un état d’esprit particulier de l’ascète. Loin d’être une émotion spontanée et passive, elle constitue un objet artificiel capable, de par son aspect paradoxal, de joindre les dimensions ascétique et mystique de l’expérience monastique, et donc d’ouvrir à la perception d’une altérité transcendante. Ce qui remet en question les interprétations de la religion, tant scientifiques que théologiques, qui en font une réalité passive de l’humain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des sciences religieusesSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207