MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135627676 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab002.134

A136 LIVING ON THE EDGE: EUS-DIRECTED TRANSGASTRIC ERCP (EDGE) IN PATIENTS WITH ROUX-EN-Y GASTRIC BYPASS ANATOMY

2021· article· en· W3135627676 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ashish Jain, Robert L. Barclay, Fergal Donnellan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGastric bypassRoux-en-Y anastomosisEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographySurgeryStomachGeneral surgeryEndoscopyFistulaEnteroscopyGastroenterologyInternal medicinePancreatitisWeight loss

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery imposes anatomic barriers to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Potential options for biliary access in these patients include laparoscopic-assisted ERCP or balloon enteroscopy. However, these approaches require specialized equipment and/or operating room personnel and are associated with high rates of failure and adverse events compared to conventional ERCP. A recently described technique, EUS-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE), is an entirely endoscopic approach which involves accessing the excluded stomach to facilitate conventional ERCP. Objectives To describe the results of EDGE procedures performed in two centres in British Columbia. Aims To describe the results of EDGE procedures performed in two centres in British Columbia. Methods Data were collected from five patient cases who had undergone an EDGE procedure at Victoria General Hospital (4) or Vancouver General Hospital (1) in British Columbia from 2019 to 2020. All patients had a history of RYGB bariatric surgery. In each of the procedures, a 20 mm diameter lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) was deployed under EUS-guidance to allow access from the gastric remnant or proximal jejunum to the excluded stomach. Subsequently, during a separate procedure 4 to 28 days later, a duodenoscope was passed through the LAMS to perform ERCP. Following ERCP, the LAMS was removed 0 to 38 days later and replaced with a double pigtail stent to facilitate controlled closure of the gastro-jejunal or gastro-gastric fistula. Results Of the five cases included in the case series, 4 patients underwent EDGE for treatment of choledocholithiasis and one patient underwent the procedure for gallstone pancreatitis. The technical success rate of the EDGE procedure in the five cases was 100%. Clinical success, defined by normalization of bilirubin and symptomatic relief, was observed in all of the cases. There were no adverse events related to the EDGE procedure in these five cases. Conclusions The results of this series support EDGE as a safe and minimally invasive approach to biliary access and therapy in patients with previous RYGB surgery. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.864

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicGallbladder and Bile Duct DisordersFrench-language works237,207