MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135634047

Optimización de la operación anual de una planta de cogeneración con bagazo

2007· article· es· W3135634047 on OpenAlexaff
Osvaldo Romero Romero, Peter Douglas, Esteban Jesús Quintero Concepción

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2007
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEngineering
TopicThermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSugar caneCogenerationSugarProfitability indexSugar productionWork (physics)Raw materialBiomass (ecology)Environmental scienceMathematicsEngineeringAgricultural engineeringElectricity generationEconomicsAgronomyMechanical engineeringChemistryBiologyFood sciencePower (physics)Physics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente trabajo se realiza con el objetivo de optimizar la duración de los períodos de operación de un complejo azucarero integrado que opera todo el año procesando caña energética como materia prima al terminar la zafra azucarera, para su realización se tomó como objeto de estudio el central Melanio Hernández, en el que se propone una planta para cogenerar todo el año utilizando esta alternativa de combustible para después de la zafra. Para la realización del mismo se planteó una función objetivo en la que se persigue maximizar las ganancias anuales del complejo integrado y su planteamiento se basa en la variación que tendrán los costos variables de operación sobre todo de la destilería y la planta de cogeneración a partir de los aportes de miel y bagazo que se puedan obtener en cada uno de los períodos de operación. Los resultados más importantes que se alcanzan con el trabajo demuestran la factibilidad de la optimización realizada, la validez de la función objetivo obtenida y la importancia que sigue teniendo para la rentabilidad de un complejo integrado con estas características el período de producción azucarera.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.494
Teacher spread0.425 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicThermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling SystemsFrench-language works237,207