MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 15518: Impact of Menopause on Cardiovascular Risk Factors Among Women Without Cardiovascular Disease: Insights From the CARTaGENE Study

2020· article· en· W3135710099 on OpenAlexaffabout
Catherine-Elisabeth Boutet, Maria Lopez Laporte, Ahmed AlTurki, Jiayi Ni, Anh Thi Nguyen, Jean‐Claude Tardif, Jean C. Grégoire, Mark Sherman, Marie‐Pierre Dubé, João Pedro Ferreira, Nadia Giannetti, George Thanassoulis, Abhinav Sharma, Thao Huynh

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart InstituteUniversity of TorontoMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineClinical endpointHazard ratioMyocardial infarctionMenopauseProportional hazards modelProspective cohort studyCardiologyPhysical therapyClinical trialConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The effect of menopausal status on the risk factors of cardiovascular (CV) disease is not well ascertained. We aimed to evaluate the impact of menopause on several traditional and non-traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors. Methods: The CARTaGENE study was a prospective cohort study with random sampling of individuals in Quebec, Canada. We completed a seven-year follow-up in 2016. For this analysis, we included only subjects without prior cardiovascular (CV) events (CVE) or CV interventions (CVI). We defined the primary endpoint as CVE which can be any of the following events: acute coronary syndromes, heart failure, strokes, CV deaths, and peripheral vascular events. The secondary endpoint was CVI which included coronary, carotid, or peripheral artery revascularization. We used Cox proportional hazard stepwise multivariate analyses to identify independent predictors of the primary endpoint separately in pre- and post-menopausal women. Results Of 9,529 women without prior CV disease, 57% were post-menopausal. The mean age was 47.4 years and 58.6 years for pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women, respectively. There were 793 CVEs and 83 CVIs with a median time to event of 6.6 years. Hypertension, active smoking, increased waist to hip ratio, and glycosylated hemoglobin were independent predictors of the primary endpoint in both pre- and post-menopausal women. Furthermore, advanced age, family history of myocardial infarction, prior cancer, increased gamma-glutamyl transferase, and hyperuricemia also predicted increased riks of the primary endpoint in post-menopausal women. Conclusion: Hypertension, active smoking, increased waist to hip ratio, and high glycosylated hemoglobin were associated with increased CV risk in pre-menopausal women. The impact of hypertension was markedly amplified in pre-menopausal women compared to postmenopausal women. Intensive blood pressure control should be considered in pre-menopausal women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors→French-language works237,207→