MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135733673

Morphological and Genetic Analyses Suggest Some Strains under Tiphodytes gerriphagus (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae: Scelioninae), an Egg Parasitoid of Water Striders

2018· article· en· W3135733673 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Takahiro Nishimori, Kazuki Miura, Kaoru Maetô, Jitsuko Miwa, Kenzou Yamagishi

Bibliographic record

VenueKobe University Repository Kernel (Kobe University) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNational Agriculture and Food Research Organization
KeywordsHymenopteraParasitoidBiologyZoologyTaxonomy (biology)Ecology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We conducted morphological observation and DNA analysis of Japanese Tiphodytes. In morphological observation, not only was T. gerriphagus identified, but also five strains were confirmed from individuals of Tiphodytes identified and morphological characters of the five strains except for T. gerriphagus did not match previous described Tiphodytes species. In ML tree based on 28S and COI sequence data analyzed from individulas of Tiphodytes identified, T. gerriphagus and the five strains were formed and the nodes of this species and the strains were well supported by bootstrap. The Fst values of 28S and COI sequence data analyzed from Tiphodytes collected indicated genetic differentiation between pairs of T. gerriphagus and each strain, and between pairs of strains. These results indicate that the genus Tiphodytes in Japan consists of at least T. gerriphagus and five strains, which probably include different species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKobe University Repository Kernel (Kobe University)Same topicInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlFrench-language works237,207