MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3135734279

Ondansetron and Oral Rehydration Therapy in Pediatric Patients with Dehydration: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness [Internet]

2020· review· en· W3135734279 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erika MacDonald, Suzanne McCormack

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDehydrationMedicineVomitingDiarrheaOral rehydration therapyAnesthesiaInternal medicineChemistryHealth services
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dehydration occurs when losses of water and electrolytes are not adequately replaced,, often secondary to vomiting and diarrhea related to gastroenteritis. Severe dehydration and the resultant decreased blood volume results in decreased tissue perfusion and can cause ischemic end-organ damage if not corrected with fluid repletion. Oral rehydration solution was an important medical advance, resulting in decreased mortality from diarrheal illness.Several methods of defining and categorizing severity of dehydration have been used in the literature. The World Health Organization (WHO) categorizes dehydration as severe dehydration (two or more signs of severe dehydration), some dehydration (two or more signs of dehydration that are not severe), or no dehydration (not meeting the criteria for some or severe). The Clinical Dehydration Scale is a validated four-item scale categorizing dehydration as mild, moderate or severe according to physical exam findings; the clinical features assessed are appearance, eyes, mucous membranes, and tears. A score between 1 and 4 is considered mild dehydration, whereas a score of 5 to 8 is considered moderate to severe. Dehydration can also be categorized according to percentage of body weight lost; mild dehydration corresponds to a loss of 3% to 5% of body weight, moderate 6% to 9%, and severe 10% or greater.,Oral rehydration therapy refers to the frequent administration of small amounts of fluid in order to prevent or treat dehydration. The oral rehydration solution recommended by the WHO contains 75 mEq/L of sodium and 75 mmol/L of glucose, with a total osmolarity of 245 mOsm/L. For severe dehydration, WHO recommends intravenous administration of isotonic fluid as well as oral rehydration therapy with oral rehydration solution if feasible. Oral rehydration therapy (with oral rehydration solution) is recommended for children with some dehydration. Administration of extra oral fluids at home is recommended for children with no dehydration. A number of antiemetics have been studied in children with gastroenteritis, including dexamethasone, dimenhydrinate, domperidone, granisetron, metoclopramide, and ondansetron. Apart from ondansetron, evidence to support the use of other antiemetics in children with acute gastroenteritis is lacking.,Ondansetron is a serotonin receptor antagonist, selective for the 5-HT3 subtype. It is indicated for the prevention and treatment of nausea and vomiting related to chemotherapy or radiotherapy, as well as post-operative nausea and vomiting, in children age 4-18 and adults. Ondansetron is available in Canada as an oral solution, tablet, and oral disintegrating tablet (ODT). It is typically well-tolerated; the most common adverse effects include mild headache, asthenia, constipation, and dizziness., Although, an increased risk of diarrhea up to 48 hours after administration of ondansetron was the most commonly reported adverse effect in studies of children with gastroenteritis. Ondansetron causes dose-dependent prolongation of the QT-interval, and cases of torsades de pointes have been reported. Ondansetron should be avoided in patients with congenital long QT syndrome and used with caution in individuals at risk of torsades de pointes.The Canadian pediatric society recommends considering a single dose of ondansetron for children between 6 months to 12 years old presenting to the emergency department with vomiting related to suspected acute gastroenteritis, and mild to moderate dehydration or failed oral rehydration therapy. They recommend initiation of oral rehydration therapy 15 min to 30 min after administration of oral ondansetron.The objective of this review was to summarize the evidence surrounding the clinical effectiveness of ondansetron for pediatric patients with or at risk of mild to moderate dehydration. For the purposes of this report, dehydration is categorized as mild to moderate according to the definitions used within the included studies. The population considered to be “at risk” of dehydration includes those who do not meet the criteria for mild or moderate dehydration according to the study definition but in whom oral rehydration therapy is deemed necessary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology→French-language works237,207→