How common is primary aldosteronism?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Primary aldosteronism, characterized by renin-independent aldosterone secretion from one or both adrenal glands, is the most common and modifiable form of secondary hypertension. The prevalence of primary aldosteronism is increasingly recognized to be much higher than previously thought with many cases still undetected. RECENT FINDINGS: Prior prevalence studies on primary aldosteronism have reported a wide range of estimates due to heterogeneity of both disease definitions and study populations such that it is difficult to claim a single point estimate. More recent evidence demonstrates that primary aldosteronism, as defined by conventional biochemical diagnostic criteria, is highly prevalent within populations where it is not typically considered such as mild-to-moderate hypertension, prehypertension, and even normotension. Yet, our current screening approach fails to capture many cases. Furthermore, there is mounting evidence that renin-independent aldosteronism exists as a continuum of disease that extends below the current biochemical diagnostic thresholds used to define primary aldosteronsim and has clinically relevant treatment and outcome implications for a much broader patient population. Indeed, much of what we current label as 'essential hypertension' is, in fact, renin-independent aldosterone-mediated hypertension. SUMMARY: Primary aldosteronism and milder forms of renin-independent aldosteronism are highly prevalent, yet vastly under-recognized, in the general population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".