MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135779565 · doi:10.1016/j.xops.2021.100006

Increased Corneal Endothelial Cell Migration in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

2021· article· en· W3135779565 on OpenAlexaff
Stephan Ong Tone, Adam Wylęgała, Myriam Böhm, Geetha Melangath, Neha Deshpande, Ula V. Jurkunas

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmology Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCorneal surgery and disorders
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersNational Eye Institute
KeywordsEx vivoIn vivoCorneaCellEndothelial stem cellOphthalmologyCell migrationChemistryMedicinePathologyBiologyIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose To investigate if corneal endothelial cells (CECs) in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) have altered cellular migration compared with normal controls. Design Comparative analysis. Materials Descemet's membrane and CECs derived from patients with FECD undergoing endothelial keratoplasty or normal cadaveric donors. Methods Ex vivo specimens were used for live cell imaging and generation of immortalized cell lines. Live imaging was performed on FECD and normal CECs and on ex vivo specimens transfected with green fluorescent protein. Migration speeds were determined as a function of cellular density using automated cell tracking. Ex vivo specimens were classified as either FECD or normal low cell density (nonconfluent) or high cell density (confluent). Scratch assay was performed on CECs seeded at high confluence to determine migration speed. Genetic analysis from blood samples or CECs was performed to detect a CTG repeat expansion in the TCF4 gene. Main Outcome Measures Mean cell migration speed. Results Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy CECs in low cell density areas displayed increased mean speed (0.391 ± 0.005 μm/minute vs. 0.364 ± 0.005 μm/minute; P < 0.001) and mean maximum speed (0.961 ± 0.010 μm/minute vs. 0.787 ± 0.011 μm/minute; P < 0.001) compared with normal CECs, and increased mean maximum speed (0.778 ± 0.014 μm/minute vs. 0.680 ± 0.011 μm/minute; P < 0.001) in high cell density areas ex vivo. Similarly, FECD CECs displayed increased mean speed compared with normal CECs (1.958 ± 0.020 μm/minute vs. 2.227 ± 0.021 μm/minute vs. 1.567 ± 0.019 μm/minute; P < 0.001) under nonconfluent conditions in vitro. Moreover, FECD CECs also displayed increased mean speed compared with normal CECs under high confluent conditions as detected by scratch assay (37.2 ± 1.1% vs. 44.3 ± 4.1% vs. 70.7 ± 5.2%; P < 0.001). Morphologic analysis showed that FECD CECs displayed an increased fibroblastic phenotype as detected by filamentous-actin labeling. Conclusions Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy CECs demonstrated increased migration speed compared with normal CECs. Further investigation into the mechanisms of heightened cell migration in FECD is needed and may provide insight into its pathogenesis, as well as having implications on descemetorhexis without endothelial keratoplasty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOphthalmology ScienceSame topicCorneal surgery and disordersFrench-language works237,207