MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135806161 · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00961

An Update on MRMAssayDB: A Comprehensive Resource for Targeted Proteomics Assays in the Community

2021· article· en· W3135806161 on OpenAlexafffund
Pallab Bhowmick, Simon Roome, Christoph H. Borchers, David R. Goodlett, Yassene Mohammed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Proteome Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General HospitalUniversity of Victoria
FundersWarren Y. Soper Charitable TrustFondation De Famille Alvin SegalMinistry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian FederationJewish General HospitalTerry Fox Research InstituteEuropean Regional Development FundFundacja na rzecz Nauki PolskiejEuropean CommissionGenome British ColumbiaSkolkovo Institute of Science and TechnologyGenome CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsProteomicsComputational biologyComputer scienceAnnotationQuantitative proteomicsResource (disambiguation)BioinformaticsBiologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Precise multiplexed quantification of proteins in biological samples can be achieved by targeted proteomics using multiple or parallel reaction monitoring (MRM/PRM). Combined with internal standards, the method achieves very good repeatability and reproducibility enabling excellent protein quantification and allowing longitudinal and cohort studies. A laborious part of performing such experiments lies in the preparation steps dedicated to the development and validation of individual protein assays. Several public repositories host information on targeted proteomics assays, including NCI's Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium assay portals, PeptideAtlas SRM Experiment Library, SRMAtlas, PanoramaWeb, and PeptideTracker, with all offering varying levels of details. We introduced MRMAssayDB in 2018 as an integrated resource for targeted proteomics assays. The Web-based application maps and links the assays from the repositories, includes comprehensive up-to-date protein and sequence annotations, and provides multiple visualization options on the peptide and protein level. We have extended MRMAssayDB with more assays and extensive annotations. Currently it contains >828 000 assays covering >51 000 proteins from 94 organisms, of which >17 000 proteins are present in >2400 biological pathways, and >48 000 mapping to >21 000 Gene Ontology terms. This is an increase of about four times the number of assays since introduction. We have expanded annotations of interaction, biological pathways, and disease associations. A newly added visualization module for coupled molecular structural annotation browsing allows the user to interactively examine peptide sequence and any known PTMs and disease mutations, and map all to available protein 3D structures. Because of its integrative approach, MRMAssayDB enables a holistic view of suitable proteotypic peptides and commonly used transitions in empirical data. Availability: http://mrmassaydb.proteincentre.com.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Proteome ResearchSame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207