Dynamic Resource Management for Providing QoS in Drone Delivery Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Drones have been considered as an alternative means of package delivery to reduce the delivery cost and time. Due to the battery limitations, the drones are best suited for last-mile delivery, i.e., the delivery from the package distribution centers (PDCs) to the customers. Since a typical delivery system consists of multiple PDCs, each having random and time-varying demands, the dynamic drone-to-PDC allocation would be of great importance in meeting the demand in an efficient manner. In this paper, we study the dynamic drone assignment problem for a drone delivery system with the goal of providing measurable Quality of Service (QoS) guarantees. We adopt a queueing theoretic approach to model the customer-service nature of the problem. Furthermore, we take a deep reinforcement learning approach to obtain a dynamic policy for the re-allocation of the drones. This policy guarantees a probabilistic upper-bound on the queue length of the packages waiting in each PDC, which is beneficial from both the service provider's and the customers' viewpoints. We evaluate the performance of our proposed algorithm by considering three broad arrival classes, including Bernoulli, Time-Varying Bernoulli, and Markov-Modulated Bernoulli arrivals. Our results show that the proposed method outperforms the baselines, particularly in scenarios with Time-Varying and Markov-Modulated Bernoulli arrivals, which are more representative of real-world demand patterns. Moreover, our algorithm satisfies the QoS constraints in all the studied scenarios while minimizing the average number of drones in use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".