Facteurs invoqués dans l’évaluation de la compétence parentale en protection de la jeunesse : comparaison des perspectives sociale et judiciaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En contexte de protection de la jeunesse, l’évaluation des compétences parentales est un sujet particulièrement sensible. Basé sur une analyse documentaire du contenu de 50 dossiers judiciarisés d’enfants de moins de 14 ans signalés pour négligence, le présent article compare les facteurs invoqués pour évaluer la compétence parentale dans les perspectives sociale et judiciaire en contexte de protection de la jeunesse. Les résultats révèlent que ces facteurs sont convergents dans une large mesure et qu’ils reposent essentiellement sur des risques individuels attribués aux parents. Ce constat est intéressant en ce sens qu’il positionne les intervenants sociaux comme des acteurs susceptibles d’influencer les représentations sociales de la parentalité et de la maternité dans la sphère judiciaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".