Bibliographic record
Abstract
The optical absorptance from arrays of GaAs nanowires (NWs) was examined by the finite element method. Absorptance in cylindrical NWs, frustum nanocones (with base wider than the top) and inverted frustum nanocones (with top wider than the base) was compared. The introduction of higher order HE 1n modes, the red-shift of the HE 1n modes along the NW length due to NW tapering, and the red-shift of the modes due to increase of the overall NW diameter all contribute to a broadening of the absorption spectrum in conical NWs as compared to NWs with a constant diameter. The optical reflectance versus NW top diameter shows a minimum due to a balance between reflectance from the top of the NWs and reflectance from the substrate between NWs. The optimum geometry for photovoltaic energy conversion was determined from the total photocurrent. An optimum photocurrent of 26.5 mAcm -2 was obtained, corresponding to a conical NW morphology with base diameter of 200 nm, top diameter of 110 nm, and length of 2000 nm. An optimized inverse tapered conical morphology gave comparable performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".