PENGARUH KUALITAS LAYANAN, HARGA, KEPUASAN PELANGGAN SERTA LOYALITAS PELANGGAN PADA PT KAI KOMMUTER JABODETABEK STASIUN DEPOK JAWA BARAT
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kebijakan pada kualitas pelayanan dan harga tiket dapat mempengaruhi loyalitas pelanggan jasa PT KAI Commuter Jabodetabek. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh kualitas pelayanan dan harga tiket terhadap loyalitas pelanggan jasa PT KAI Commuter Jabodetabek, baik secara simultan maupun parsial. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode kuantitatif yang bersifat deskriptif dan verifikatif dengan ukuran populasi 100 responden dengan teknik sampling. Pengolahan data menggunakan analisis regresi linear berganda dan koefisien determinasi pada taraf signifikan 5%. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik observasi, wawancara dan kuesioner. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan besarnya pengaruh kualitas pelayanan dan harga tiket terhadap loyalitas pelanggan jasa PT KAI Commuter Jabodetabek sebesar 31.9%, model dapat dijalankan dan sisanya (68.1%) tidak dapat dijalankan oleh variabel lainnya yang tidak diteliti. Kualitas pelayanan memberikan pengaruh yang lebih besar dibandingkan dengan harga tiket terhadap loyalitas pelanggan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it