MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135897702 · doi:10.1111/cge.13955

<scp> <i>GCH1</i> </scp> mutations in hereditary spastic paraplegia

2021· article· en· W3135897702 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Parizad Varghaei, Grace Yoon, Mehrdad A. Estiar, Simon Veyron, Etienne Léveillé, Nicolas Dupré, Jean‐François Trempe, Guy A. Rouleau, Ziv Gan‐Or

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Genetics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHereditary Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoMcGill UniversityHospital for Sick Children
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsHereditary spastic paraplegiaParaplegiaSpasticGeneticsMutationMedicineNeuroscienceBiologyPhenotypePhysical medicine and rehabilitationGeneSpinal cordCerebral palsy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

)-deficient hyperphenylalaninemia B. Recently, GCH1 mutations have been reported in five patients with hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP). Here, we analyzed a total of 400 HSP patients (291 families) from different centers across Canada by whole exome sequencing (WES). Three patients with heterozygous GCH1 variants were identified: monozygotic twins with a p.(Ser77_Leu82del) variant, and a patient with a p.(Val205Glu) variant. The former variant is predicted to be likely pathogenic and the latter is pathogenic. The three patients presented with childhood-onset lower limb spasticity, hyperreflexia and abnormal plantar responses. One of the patients had diurnal fluctuations, and none had parkinsonism or dystonia. Phenotypic differences between the monozygotic twins were observed, who responded well to levodopa treatment. Pathway enrichment analysis suggested that GCH1 shares processes and pathways with other HSP-associated genes, and structural analysis of the variants indicated a disruptive effect. In conclusion, GCH1 mutations may cause HSP; therefore, we suggest a levodopa trial in HSP patients and including GCH1 in the screening panels of HSP genes. Clinical differences between monozygotic twins suggest that environmental factors, epigenetics, and stochasticity could play a role in the clinical presentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical GeneticsSame topicHereditary Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207