MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135900001 · doi:10.1117/12.2578995

Progress on combining OCT-A with deep learning for diabetic retinopathy diagnosis

2021· article· en· W3135900001 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy T. Yu, Da Ma, Julian Lo, Cyrus WaChong, Michael Chambers, Mirza Faisal Beg, Marinko V. Šarunic

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiabetic retinopathyComputer scienceDeep learningOptometryArtificial intelligenceMedicineOphthalmologyDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present novel approaches of implementing state-of-the-art deep learning techniques for the processing of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) images for the classification of diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity. The effects of feature-engineering on a deep neural network’s classification performance is compared against unprocessed OCT-A images. We investigate the effects of lower axial resolution (simulated by using a narrower spectral bandwidth) on the classification of DR severity, and the recovery of lost features using a generative adversarial network. We also explore the relationship between DR severity classification and lateral resolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207